jason1025 Posted January 24, 2020 Posted January 24, 2020 But if you use bootcamp to partition your drive and dual boot into windows, AM is very stable. Quote
*A:M User* Roger Posted January 25, 2020 *A:M User* Posted January 25, 2020 Here are my results: Best time was 2:13 on a Ryzen 3500U mobile processor. I will test with my Threadripper 1950x system a bit later and post those results. Quote
jason1025 Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 Did I do it? DO I have the All time fastest record? AMD 3970x 32 core 64 threads 256GB DDR4 3200mhz ram ASROCK TRX40 Creator motherboard 2x Gygabyte Radeon 5700xt GPUs 1 Quote
Fuchur Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 You should with that kind of system ;). I think the king till now was 1:29 and you got it cut by 15s for single core again and I am pretty sure you would kill it for a multi-core benchmark like the following one with that machine. Looks like quite a beasty one – congratulations ;). AM Bench 2017: Benchmark: https://www.patchwork3d.de/am-bench-2017-201-en Best regards *Fuchur* Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted May 9, 2020 Author Hash Fellow Posted May 9, 2020 Very impressive! Quote
jason1025 Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 Cool the 1st 2 frames came in at 1:14, but the last frame was 1:15 Quote
*A:M User* Shelton Posted October 27, 2021 *A:M User* Posted October 27, 2021 CPU Benchmark - 1:03 AMD 5950X 16 cores 32 threads 4.25 ghz 32 gb of RAM Quote
*A:M User* Shelton Posted October 27, 2021 *A:M User* Posted October 27, 2021 CPU Benchmark - 1:00 AMD 5950X 16 cores 32 threads 4.35 ghz 32 gb of RAM I re ran the test since it was performed while on a Zoom call. 1 Quote
Fuchur Posted October 28, 2021 Posted October 28, 2021 Uh, the big guy: 5950x ;). That one is a beast :). I am pretty sure that the zoom meeting was close to not mattering at all for a 16 core machine like that ;). You would have to run Netrender with at least 15 slaves (maybe even 30 or so) that it would make a big difference ;). Best regards *Fuchur* 1 Quote
*A:M User* Shelton Posted April 12, 2022 *A:M User* Posted April 12, 2022 Well Here you go Intel I9 12900 with 32 gigs of ddr5 all NVMe drives Samsung 980s. This is the 2009 bench mark 47 seconds a frame. I am rendering the 2017 benchmark now and should have results shortly. I redid the AMD 5950x and got 59 secs to 1:01 per frame. 1 Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted May 9, 2022 Author Hash Fellow Posted May 9, 2022 53 seconds! Steve @Shelton has gifted me with a fabulous new computer to further my A:M computing. Thank you, Steve! At the very top of this thread, in 2009, that benchmark scene was taking 19 minutes and 59 seconds to render. Now it's less than 1 minute! Quote
*A:M User* Shelton Posted May 10, 2022 *A:M User* Posted May 10, 2022 Robert That is the results I was getting as well when I tested. That is wonderful results!! The video card will be mailed by this weekend as well. Steve Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted May 22, 2022 Author Hash Fellow Posted May 22, 2022 On 5/9/2022 at 6:52 PM, robcat2075 said: 53 seconds! Steve @Shelton has gifted me with a fabulous new computer to further my A:M computing. Thank you, Steve! At the very top of this thread, in 2009, that benchmark scene was taking 19 minutes and 59 seconds to render. Now it's less than 1 minute! I forgot the specs... version: v19.5 (beta) render time: 0:53 CPU Brand and model: Intel i7-12700K Actual CPU speed in GHz: about 4.8GHz in this render how many cores A:M is using: probably just one although CPU has 12 RAM: 32 GB! OS: Windows 10 Computer also has a 500 GB NVMe SSD for the C : drive Quote
Fuchur Posted May 23, 2022 Posted May 23, 2022 Computer also has a 500 MB NVMe SSD for the c : drive => GB hopefully ;). Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted May 23, 2022 Author Hash Fellow Posted May 23, 2022 30 minutes ago, Fuchur said: Computer also has a 500 MB NVMe SSD for the 😄 drive => GB hopefully ;). Fixed! And that smiley face should have been a "C:" 1 Quote
Madfox Posted November 4, 2022 Posted November 4, 2022 Last time in 2013 it took winxp 23minutes. A new computer gives another result. Windows 11 64bit Intel Core i9 10900x @ 3.70GHz 10 cores 20 threads AM v19 0.op SSE4 😊 1 Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted November 4, 2022 Author Hash Fellow Posted November 4, 2022 @Madfox One more setting to check is your computer's Power Option. By default the OS is usually set to a power saving mode and the CPU never cranks up to its highest speed when it's just running mainly one core (Like A:M does) NetRender calls up more cores and will usually crank up the CPU even when a power saving mode is selected. Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted November 25, 2023 Author Hash Fellow Posted November 25, 2023 Here is a modest new best for my machine, after trying some overclocking... 49 seconds. Quote
gazzamataz Posted October 8 Posted October 8 Well I thought I would have a go, takes me back to the good old days of running an Athlon Thunderbird processor My report: Version of A:M: 19.5e Render time: 1:54 CPU Brand and model: AMD Threadripper 1920 Actual CPU speed in GHz: 3.5ghz How many cores A:M is using: 12 cores RAM: 64gb OS: Windows 10 Pro Not too sloppy... If I remember correctly when I was using AM 11 and my Athlo Thunderbird if your machine took a minute or less to render the benchmark file that was good. No GPU rendering here yet then? Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted October 10 Author Hash Fellow Posted October 10 On 10/8/2025 at 11:26 AM, gazzamataz said: Actual CPU speed in GHz: 3.5ghz Since your CPU has a higher base speed (4.0MHz) I think) there must be some way to make it use that. Quote
gazzamataz Posted October 17 Posted October 17 Rob, the base speed of my processor is 3.5ghz with a boost speed of 4ghz. When I built my system back in 2018 I deliberately choose the 1920x over the 1950x since I wanted a higher clock speed which is more use when animating. Unfortunately now it is redundant since it doesn't support Windows 11. So I either lumber on with unsupported Windows 10 or buy and build a new system. I do have a Mac mini M2Pro which is twice as fast on the single core front which makes animating much faster, not so many previews! I am very tempted by the M4 Mac Studio but they are expensive by the time you have spec'ed them up… Quote
Hash Fellow robcat2075 Posted October 17 Author Hash Fellow Posted October 17 10 hours ago, gazzamataz said: So I either lumber on with unsupported Windows 10 or buy and build a new system.. there are options to have Windows 10 support for another year, have you checked those? Quote
Ganthofer Posted October 17 Posted October 17 I've seen a number of YouTube vids listed (haven't watched any of them 😉) on Installing/upgrading Win11 on older/unsupported hardware. Would that be a possibility for you? Quote
gazzamataz Posted October 18 Posted October 18 I think I might go down the extended licence route which I have heard about. Thing is my system is seven years old now but pretty much does what I want it to do. I am in the very nice position of being semi- retired and not needing to do so much paid work. So I don’t need a sooper dooper machine although the Cinebench single core processor speed is 60 whereas a new Ryzen 9750 would give 135 over twice the speed… Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.